Luckily we can adjust that in Photoshop. It does help some.
J. C. O'Connell wrote: > But the "look" is similar. I forgot to > post that in either of these cases > the film grain is NOT an issue. Its more > the tonal range captured and the look > of the extreme highlights. Film captures > more but the curves are not straight, > there is a knee on the hightlights. Whereas > digital can't capture as much range but there > isnt a knee, its straight right up to > the point of clipping... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jack Davis > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:15 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: The "Film Look" > > > I've had the same experience. Stills, by their nature, may lend > themselves to more scrutiny. > > Jack > --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My interpretation of the "film look" is like >> watching a high quality movie ( 70mm print ) >> vs. a high defintion live video broadcast >> ( more like the "digital" look ). >> jco >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ____________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > http://new.mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
