I thought you guys were just surrepticiously referring to him as a jock...
Tom C. >From: keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private >emails >Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:05:28 -0800 > >William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "keith_w" > > Subject: Re: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private >emails > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> HAR! I did send him an e-mail asking him to lay off Tom in regard to > >>> the television. Of course he had to get the last word in. I decided > >>> to see if I could outlast him. The man needs help. Paul > > > Paul, you should know better than that. I tried it a while back and ran >a > > thread to in excess of 2000 messages before I gave up. > > I guess the nice thing about having no life is that you can take the >time to > > turn everything into an argument and then outlast your victims. > > I don't have the time for it. > > >> The real question here is, why not just 'plonk' him? Relegate all > >> messages that even mention his name, to a Junk Folder! > >> > >> It's obvious I need a more sophisticated set of message filters for > >> scrubbing J.O.C. from view! > > > It's what I decided to do. Now if you would just use it's initials in >the > > right order, my filter would work too. > > > > William Robb > >Okay, Okay....I left out the apostrophe. J. O'C. >Full account of all first letters would be J.O.O'C., but I left out his >middle name too. > >How's that for instant recovery? <g> > >keith > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
