> JPEG files straight out of the cameras with same lens on both. > The file names say something and full Exif inside. Untouched. > > FA 1.7/50mm (200 or 100 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_50mm_200.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_50mm_100.jpg > > Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (200 or 100 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_200mm_200.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_200mm_100.jpg > > Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (1600 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_200mm_1600.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_200mm_1600.jpg > > Apply some unsharp mask and draw your own conclusions. > > Dario
That's I slight edge to the K10D IMHO, but it is slight. There seems to be less noise at ISO 1600 with the K10D than with the ist D which I wouldn't have expected. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
