I dont agree that SR cannot be implemented with FF lenses completely or even with limited use of the ff sensor when SR is on. This would be better than APS or larger than APS but smaller than full frame because it could still do everthing those types of designs could do and more. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Simpson Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:03 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Official Full Frame Pentax Rumor - Technical Limitations of K Given what I am reading here, if the marketplace demands SR, and we want our installed base of lenses to still work properly, and you want a sensor bigger than APC, then it may be the best deal you are going to get. Seems like otherwise, we are going to have to give up one of the above. Note that whatever you think of the expendability of SR, the market in general would probably overrule you. Sooo...unless you want to junk all your lenses... -Tom in SC J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I dont like the idea for anything between APS > and FF. If your going to go bigger than APS, might as > well go for the whole lens cirle which is about > 2.25 times the area used now. > jco > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
