See, again no mention of me..

I can still do my thing

<g>

Dave

Quoting Jostein Øksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Are you letting me in?!?
>
> Wohooo!
>
> Finally!
>
> Thank you Tom, that's very generous.
>
> Jostein
>
>
> On 12/29/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh yeah? Well don't believe anything Jostein says either.  :-)
>>
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>>
>>
>> >From: "Jostein Øksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
>> >Subject: Re: Introduction
>> >Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:58:04 +0100
>> >
>> >Welcome to the list!
>> >Hhere are some things that are usually said to newcomers: <g>
>> >
>> >1. Don't believe anything Cotty, Frank Theriault, Mark Roberts, Tom C
>> >and William Robb says.
>> >
>> >that's about it, I think.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Jostein
>> >
>> ><g, d & r>
>> >
>> >On 12/29/06, W. Guy Finley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Hello all!  Found this list after intensely studying Stan's Pentax
>> > > page trying to figure out what in the world I was doing with lenses
>> > > for my new baby.
>> > >
>> > > I learned on my dad's K1000 (more later) and after a hiatus until
>> > > early adulthood I got back into photography but went Canon with an
>> > > EOS-3 and a Tokina 28-80/2.8 as my mainstay lens and a couple of
>> > > primes.  I went broke feeding film into that camera so when digital
>> > > started hitting it big I grabbed a Canon G3 and ditched my EOS
>> > > system.  I then had a Sigma SD-9 and then a Sony DMC-V1 that I went
>> > > to the extent of getting a Metz 50 MZ-5 system for.
>> > >
>> > > The Sony has long since been wanting to be retired so I started
>> > > looking at another bridge camera.  That's when I saw reviews for the
>> > > new Pentax K digitals.  I had thought about an ist-D a bit back but
>> > > never made the leap.  I went and found the trusty K1000 and sure
>> > > enough the M 50/2 and Takumar 135/2.8 were still with it.  Not the
>> > > best lenses in the world but hey, a start.  When I saw these would
>> > > work with the new digitals I  made the leap and went for K110D
>> > > deciding I really didn't need shake reduction.
>> > >
>> > > After much confusion and screwing up of my order I ended up getting
>> > > the kit lens which isn't too bad but after doing my first Christmas
>> > > photos in Lightroom and PS CS3 beta I saw just how many shots I was
>> > > taking at 50 or 55mm.  I was going to get an ultra-wide zoom but
>> > > decided to get some manual primes instead given these results but I
>> > > can't find an FA50 in stock anywhere with a UPC intact (with the
>> > > Pentax rebates going on I wonder where those UPCs went?? hmmmm).
>> > >
>> > > After much debate, back and forth, etc, I picked up an A 50/1.4 from
>> > > KEH and saw by complete accident an M 28/3.5 at Adorama and grabbed
>> > > both along with the new Metz SCA adapter so hopefully I should be
>> > > doing some decent flash work soon.  I did Christmas completely in RAW
>> > > with the kit lens, the M 50 and the Takumar and I was really pleased
>> > > with how the shots came out aside from the obligatory tweaking I had
>> > > to do in Lightroom and PS.  After working with JPEGs for a long time
>> > > since the SD-9 (which has a proprietary RAW) working in a RAW
>> > > workflow is a godsend.  It was actually a joy to work in Lightroom
>> > > and then send images that needed more care over to PS if they needed
>> > > it and then have Lightroom recognize the PS update and add that to
>> > > the shoot.  Adobe has been doing some great work there.
>> > >
>> > > So, I look forward to tips and suggestions, any thoughts on lens
>> > > areas I may wish to fill in would be welcome.  I'm considering
>> > > holding out a few months until the new f2.8 zooms come out, the
>> > > 17-50/2.8 likely being the prime target.
>> > >
>> > >   My meager start is up at http://www.flickr.com/photos/wgfinley
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Guy
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > > PDML@pdml.net
>> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> > >
>> >
>> >--
>> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >PDML@pdml.net
>> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>



Equine Photography in York Region

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to