Thanks Paul. I should have also noted that NO noise reduction was used in the rendering of these photos.
Godfrey On Dec 29, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Nice. I'd score that as minimal noise at 1600. At least as noise free > as *ist Dx cameras could deliver. >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/48.htm >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/48a.htm >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/48b.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
