I'm sure they're very good, but I'm not about to spend that much
money! The cheaper ones are under-specified in other important areas
which I don't want to do without.

--
 Bob
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Cotty
> Sent: 30 December 2006 12:46
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: Bins
> 
> On 30/12/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
> 
> >Do any of you have these, and would like to comment? Any others I
> >should consider?
> 
> 
> I have looked through a pair of these once and it was unbelievable.
> 
> <http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-Image-Stabilising-Weather-Binoc
> ulars/dp/
> B00007EE9B>
> 
> The image stabilisation has to be experienced. I'm not in the 
> market for
> a pair, but if I were, I would consider them seriously. A hefty
price,
> but once seen.....
> 
> Really, give them a try.
> 
> There are less expensive versions:
> 
> <http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_ss_ce/203-9185258-4153512?ur
> l=search-
> alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=canon+binoculars&Go.x=0&Go.
> y=0&Go=Go>
> 
> <http://tinyurl.com/wdyrr>
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
> 
> 
> ___/\__
> ||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _____________________________
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to