Thanks Rob Id ownloaded the article and will read it. I never had anything near in the foreground in the few panos I did, that must be the point. greetings Markus
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Digital Image Studio Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Do it yourself pano head On 03/01/07, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I was just lucky so far that I did not use anything wider than a 50mm? > I will make the next panos again with the Pentax 50mm or 100mm. > greetings > Markus Not really, you could be lucky and the natural point of rotation of your lens/camera/head combo is close to the actual nodal point or like Ken your compositions don't feature close in elements that will be affected by parallax errors. There is a new article covering this issue that's worth a read: http://www.janrik.net/PanoPostings/NoParallaxPoint/TheoryOfTheNoParallaxPoin t.pdf -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 01.01.2007 14:50 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
