Yes, the cars are very similar, although there's some better detail in the grille and badges on the Imacon scan. The real different seems to be in color gradation. The Imacon distinguished the green of the trees from the blue of the fog much more accurately than the Epson. Paul On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I'm somewhat amazed at the difference in the background trees yet the > subject cars don't appear different to me. > I'd really like to see the Imacon compared to the large format > Nikon scanner > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Imacon vs. Epson 3200 > > >> Here's a pic I rescanned on my friend's Imacon. I treated it somewhat >> differently as well, both in terms of the crop and the rendering, >> but I >> still think there's a distinct difference. Note the detail in the >> background trtees. >> >> The imacon scan: >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5416945&size=lg >> >> The Epson 3200 scan: >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg >> >> No surprise, but mildly interesting perhaps. >> Paul > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
