The bulk of my cards SD now and previousely CF are Transcend and i've never had one fail. I'm quite happy with them and have been using them since i had a Canon 10D when they first came out and now i'm using them in SD with a K10d and DS.
Regards, Paul Peter Loveday wrote: >> The last time this subject came up somebody posted a link to a site >> that showed test results for several SD and SDHC cards, including >> the Transcend 2GB & 4GB cards. >> > > That would be: > http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007 > > >> The 2GB Transcend 150x card managed >> 149x sustained read transfer rate (so, Boris, while it might just fall >> short of the 150x figures, it's certainly a lot better than 120x :-), >> but only about half that for write speed. The Sandisk cards were >> also slower on read than on write, but not by a factor of two. >> > > Indeed. Despite being only 133x (in thery, not SanDisk don't really use > this terminology with these cards), the Extreme IIIs typically write faster > than most other things out there. > > Certainly compared to Godder's write tests on his 150x, my own impression of > my Extreme IIIs is that they are noticably quicker again. > > Also interesting (I think I mentioned this last time) is how much quicker > the K10D write speeds are than any of the other cameras tested on that page > (C/N stuff). He used to have the *istD up there, but it was removed at some > point (results got too old I think, he didn't have one for testing). > Probably for the best, it was downright embarrasing. > > Perhaps if he got enough requests, he would do a K10D test. > > - Peter > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
