Your correct, you cap'd PAUL STENQUEST and THEN called him clueless.
Having said that, i do not take back any comment i made on my original email. You Sir, are a jerk, a pisoffer of the most foul.As soon as someone says ANYTHING yoy don't like, you respond in the, again, the most foul. You'r a mean one Mr JCO, I would not touch you with a ten and a half foot pole. People like Stenquest, Godders, Cotty, Roberts have the utmost admeration of myself and this list. As far as i'm concerned you Sir, are the utter, in utmost. incase thats beyond you, i'm calling you a tit Dave Brooks Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > only problem is the quote is NOT TRUE as > I didnt post him as "CLUELESS" in caps so > he is just trying to cover his ass, > you can call it a mistake, I can call it > a lie. I dont see how someone could ever > mistake being called "CLUELESS" in caps > when they werent if thats what your trying > to say happened. Whatever... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Bob Sullivan > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:39 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PISS OFF JCO: Camera sold,but worries remain (yet another > eBayquestion) > > > Paul and Dave, > You know that I missed the whole thing until you guys quoted him. Dave - > you need gmail? The spam filter works great on JCO. Regards, Bob S. > > On 1/19/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Don't leave, Dave. I shouldn't have responded to the post where he >> called me "CLUELESS." It probably would have ended there, if I had >> ignored it. I've avoided filtering him, because I don't believe in >> that approach. But I'll make an exception and plunk him now. That way >> I won't even be tempted to respond to any provocation. Stick around, >> we need you. Paul >> On Jan 19, 2007, at 8:36 PM, David J Brooks wrote: >> >> > Paul replied to a thread. You called him clueless and in CAPS. >> > >> > Maybe thats the way you normally talk to people. I don;t find your >> > responses like that are needed at all. >> > >> > Thus. i'm pissed. >> > >> > YOU are the main reason i left last month and YOU are the reason i;m > >> > leaving this list for good, tonight. >> > >> > You have your right, God knows i have heard this before, to your >> > opinion on any matter not only on this list, but anywere else, after > >> > all we both live in, supposedly free countries, but good lord man, >> > if some one types something you don;t agree with, why, do you go >> > absolutly Postal. >> > >> > Yes you can tell me to FUCK OFF, I hear that daily, i'm a >> > surveyor,but i won't hear it, till i decide to read the archives. >> > >> > Oh and btw, I like Paul. >> > >> > And don;t email me off list, or i;ll tell them you did. >> > >> > >> > Dave >> > >> > . >> > >> > Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> >> Hey: F U C K Y O U T O O ! >> >> >> >> I am not going to take this shit from you >> >> or anyone else. He flew off the handle and >> >> started using profane pornographic language, >> >> not me, just because he couldnt handle being >> >> called "clueless" ( my exact word ) on >> >> something he was obviously "clueless" about. And if >> >> you think thats OK, well then me telliing >> >> you to FUCK OFF should be fine with you >> >> too then. You are the ultimate hypocrite if >> >> is isnt. And dont blame me for this outrageous profane list >> >> language, because I am not the one initiating it. >> >> >> >> Have a nice day, :) >> >> >> >> JCO >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >> Behalf Of David J Brooks >> >> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:03 PM >> >> To: pdml@pdml.net >> >> Subject: PISS OFF JCO: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another >> >> eBayquestion) >> >> >> >> >> >> JCO >> >> >> >> YOU EAT SHIT PAL. >> >> >> >> I CANNOT SEEM TO GET MY EMAIL FILTERS TO WORK, ESPECIA;LLY TO GET >> >> RID OF YOUR ASSHOLE RELATED, IDIOTIC POST. >> >> >> >> PAUL STENQUEST POSTED A REPLY, YOU CHOSE TO FLY OFF THE HANDLE >> >> AGAIN. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SOOOOOOOOO PLEASE ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY MESSAGES THAT SEEM TO WORK, > >> >> WOULD YOU FUCK OFF AND LEAVE US ALONE. >> >> >> >> SURLY THERE IS AN LCD OR PLASMA FORUM YOU CAN PISS OFF. >> >> >> >> DAVE >> >> >> >> OH BTW YOU PISS ME OFF. >> >> >> >> DAVE AGAIN >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >>> EAT SHIT ASSHOLE. PORNOGRAPHIC INSULTS for PORNOGRPHIC INSULTS! >> >>> Everyone can see why you do this, its to divert the issue from the > >> >>> topic and your total ignorance on how paypal works. My using the >> >>> word "clueless" is not on the same level as using hardcore >> >>> pornograhic sexual language you have now started and >> >>> its a true comment, not a personal insult. You >> >>> ARE clueless if you think that just because >> >>> you "have the money" from paypal there is nothing >> >>> to worry about. >> >>> >> >>> There is PLENTY to worry about with paypal as >> >>> a seller, that is why a lot of sellers dont >> >>> use it any longer, its not just because of fees either, it's their > >> >>> policies towards sellers and the strict rules they impose on them >> >>> that many sellers simply dont like. Get a clue first if >> >>> you dont want to be called clueless and >> >>> stup using crude sexual language on the list. >> >>> Its very unbecoming and not wanted here. >> >>> >> >>> jco >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >>> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:50 PM >> >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>> Subject: RE: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another eBay >> >>> question) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Here's an example of how fuckface hurls the first personal insult >> >>> of a >> >> >> >>> thread. He will of course deny it, but he will always be just >> >>> plain old fuckface. By the way, he's wrong. And he's fuckface. >> >>> >> >>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> >>> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> PNSTENQUIST is clueless. Paypal can and will take the money back >> >>>> at any time if the seller isnt very careful and abides by all >> >>>> paypal rules to the letter because of paypal buyer's claims and >> >>>> paypal buyer >> >> >> >>>> protection issues. Some sleazeball buyers use paypal's rules to >> >>>> defraud sellers. Most common one is asking seller to ship to a >> >>>> name/address other than the one registered ( as a favor ) and >> >>>> then claiming later it was shipped to wrong address and getting a > >> >>>> full refund FROM THE SELLERS PAYPAL ACCOUNT because it wasn't >> >>>> shipped properly. Buyer keeps the item for free and the seller >> >>>> loses both his >> >> >> >>>> payment for the item and the item. >> >>>> jco >> >>>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >>>> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:00 PM >> >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>>> Subject: Re: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another eBay >> >>>> question) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Since you have the money, you have nothing to worry about. Send >> >>>> him the camera. If you don't, you will have something to worry >> >>>> about since >> >>> >> >>>> he sent you the money:-). What would you want to protect yourself > >> >>>> against? You've been paid. Paul >> >>>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>>> So my *istD outfit sold last night. The buyer, unfortunately, >> >>>>> has zero feedback and his account is only a week old: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? >> >>>>> ViewItem&ih=005&sspagename=STR >> >>>>> K >> >>>>> %3 >> >>>>> AMESO% >> >>>>> 3AIT&viewitem=&item=150079244619&rd=1&rd=1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> He already sent full payment through PayPal, and the transaction > >> >>>>> was completed, so money doesn't appear to be an issue. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The thing that bothers me is that his address has both a street >> >>>>> address AND a PO Box, which I've never encountered before. Is >> >>>>> this >> >> >> >>>>> something I >> >>>> should worry >> >>>>> about? Also, is there anything else I can do to protect myself, > >> >>>>> just >> >>>> in case? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> John >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>>>> PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>>> PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>>> PDML@pdml.net >> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>> PDML@pdml.net >> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>> PDML@pdml.net >> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Equine Photography in York Region >> >> >> >> -- >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> PDML@pdml.net >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> PDML@pdml.net >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Equine Photography in York Region >> > >> > -- >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > PDML@pdml.net >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
