There's no special reason for writing this way. By which means is the A28/2 a "fine performer", had you opportunity to see pictures, probably in comparison to other Pentax 28s? I could possibly get one, but for a terrible amount of money.
Pancho Godfrey DiGiorgi schrieb: > You're welcome, Pancho. > > Why do you write the lens name reversed from how nearly everyone else > writes it? > The full lens name is "smc Pentax-FA 28mm f/2.8 AL" normally > shortened to FA28/2.8 ... > FA 2.8/28 is confusing. > > From what I've heard, the A28/2 is a fine performer, but I have only > heard that from the three people I know who've had one. I've been > trying to find one for two years unsuccessfully. > > Godfrey > > On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Pancho Hasselbach wrote: > >> Thanks for sharing, Godfrey. >> >> Just put hands on an FA 2.8/28, from a seller offering one on ebay, >> from >> which I know he also runs an online shop, often with really similar >> offers. >> >> BTW, does anybody know how A 2/28 performs, as well on film as on >> silicon? Stan's site says nothing about it, it seems to be very >> uncommon. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
