Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > I would not judge based on a quickie conversion effort, Boris. I have > a workflow that is well developed for Photoshop CS2 with Camera Raw > that's quite different from how I'm learning to work in Lightroom. > When I work with ACR, for me, I design the output to be edited to a > finish rendering in Photoshop. With Lightroom, on the other hand, I > often do the finish rendering right there as it has more tools for > adjusting nuances of the rendering directly. > > The most important point is that when processing someone else's > photograph I can only guess at what the light was like, what I might > have wanted to capture, and what I ought to render it to be without a > lot more information from the person who made the photo. > > It happens that in this case, on my screen, I like the rendering I > did in ACR/Photoshop a little more than what I did in Lightroom ... > but having spent something like 60 seconds time on either, neither is > what I'd consider a finish edit at this point. > > Godfrey
Well, of course. I am saying what I am saying based on quite a few images I processed myself. Notably two last PESOs were processed in LR. Memory of a photographer or their emotions/feelings are important meta data for processing, that goes without dispute ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
