On 06/02/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What has film got to do with the K10D's lack of ISO 3200? > > I can appreciate that in certain situations the advantages of having ISO > 3200 available outweigh it's disadvantages. > > I've taken very usable & printable ISO 1600/3200 shots with the *istD > (after some creative use of noise reduction) & I've taken pictures at ISO > 1600 on the K10D that no amount of noise reduction could help. > > Different strokes & all that.
Absolutely, and it's not really strange that the people who would be likely to use it would want it, pity about the noise. ;-) -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
