Well, if you want to really get into that range, take a look at this beast:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Babylon It was supposed to be a 1 meter gun (about 39 inches)!! rg On 2/5/07, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is getting silly, but didn't I give you a salvo of 18 inch naval guns? > That should do, period :-). > > Ken > > On 2/05/07 5:52 PM, "Gonz", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nah. Try: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAU-8 > > > > rg > > > > > > On 2/4/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Still wimpy, Russian, (WWII), 50 caliber antitank rifle round. > >> > >> K.Takeshita wrote: > >>> On 2/03/07 5:38 PM, "mike wilson", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>> On 04/02/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>> > >>>>>> More likely a .22 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Or baton round. > >>>>>> > >>>>> A BB from a modified air rifle perhaps? ;-) > > >>>>> > >>>> Sucker arrow from a toy crossbow? > > >>> > >>> Oh, wimpy ideas! > >>> Let's go big bang! > >>> 7.62 NATO armour piercing incendiary round. Nikon will take it (no?) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
