Correct. Nothing has changed since then and I think you are wrong on the date, I said that in 2006. The DSLR BODIES are still in the early evolving stage and they ARE "disposable" in that sense. The lenses, which in a system context, cost far, far more than the body are not "disposable" however (except maybe the DA lenses if FF ever becomes the defacto standard someday) . Thats why I didnt buy the K10D for now, I would rather wait for something much better in only a few years to use seriously, I bought this istDS only because I had a valid business reason for it and it met the needs, and the K10's features were not needed at this time, I didnt buy it to replace any of my current higher quality camera systems....Its of limited use to me and a K10D would not change those limits. I want something an order of magnitude better than APS 6-10MP before I am going to get real excited about digital slr photography. FF format IMHO would would be a good start for a multitude of reasons. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:25 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday? ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday? > You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state > that DSLRS are not cheap small mass market items for the masses, On October 20, 2004 you called them disposable cameras with a 5 year life expectancy before they were obsolete. http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg208271.html William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
