Obvious questions: :-)

Did you compare them both at 20mm f/4 on same same subject, same conditions, 
etc.?

The A was manual focus, the DA is auto focus.  Was focus accurte on bothe 
and were they focussed on the same spot in the image?


Tom C.


>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED
>Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:27:59 -0800 (PST)
>
>My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So
>distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never mount it on the K10D again.
>Immediately sold it on eBay ($440) to one who shoots only film.
>DA 16~45 f/4 edge performance blew it away at 20mm.
>
>Jack
>--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wrong again, your confusing digital term when
> > you should be using APS digital term.
> >
> > This brings up a VERY important issue and
> > I would like to here from everyone who
> > has any experience on the matter please,
> >
> > WHICH PENTAX FF LENSES have you had a problem
> > with like WR states here? (and on which dslr
> > camera were you having it? 6 or 10MP?), AND
> > what DA lens (or other FF lens ) did you get
> > to solve the problem if applicable?
> >
> > jco
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of
> > William Robb
> > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:23 PM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cory Papenfuss"
> > Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> >
> >
> >
> > >>
> > >  Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the
> > > additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher
> > quality
> > > photographs than are possible with older lenses.
> >
> > If I implied that, it wasn't intentional.
> > I did state (obliquely) that newer lenses may have better optical
> > designs
> > which may allow them to have better rendering characteristics. I have
> > a
> > few older lenses which I liked very much on film that are unusable
> > in digital because of lens aberations.
> > Sorry for the harsh words.
> >
> > William Robb
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
>http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to