> I really like the K series lenses > and so far they seem excellent on digital APS too. > My very latest aquisition "K" was the K120mm F2.8 (not the doggy poo > M version!) and it's freakin smokin' sharp! (should be, its an exact > copy of the superb K105/2.8 but scaled up). It took me years to find > that sucker! The K series lenses are much rarer than > the SMCTs, thats for sure. They are fun to collect and use.
I'm a big fan of the K series myself. I love the build quality and precision, never had any SMCT lenses but I believe they're great. Currently have K 18/3.5, 24/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2, 50/1.2, 135/2.5(x2), 200/4 and 300/4. I'd really like a K85/1.8 (I've got M85/2) and a K200/2.5 and yes K28/2. I'm debating whether to part with one K135/2.5 to fund an ultra-wide for the K10D, but if anyone fancies a swap K135/2.5 (mint) for K85/1.8 (similar condition) let me know. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
