I don't know. It looks like it's time to upgrade to 1.5.0.7. graywolf wrote: > 1.5.0.9, Pete, I have been letting things do automatic updates. Now, why > when did I start doing something as stupid as that? > > P. J. Alling wrote: > >> What version are you using? I'm not having any trouble with 1.5.0.7, >> which is only a couple of minor rev.s out of date. >> >> graywolf wrote: >> >>> Well, I have about decided upon the following proceedure: >>> >>> Starting with a ProphotoRGB, 16bit, 10x7.5 inch image >>> Resample, Bi-cubic Sharper, 72ppi or 100bpi >>> Convert to sRGB >>> Convert to 8 bit >>> Save for web >>> >>> That should keep the quality as high as reasonably possible. >>> >>> Now to see if I can work up a script to do that automatically. I had >>> been intending to work on that when ever I got a hold of one of those >>> round tuit things anyway <grin>. Just need to add a couple of steps. >>> >>> It really seems to be the conversion from 16 bit Prophoto that was the >>> problem. I did not have it when using 16 bit Adobe98, so there must be >>> some kind of glitch in Adobe's SFW script. Maybe the simplest thing >>> would be going back to Adobe98. >>> >>> Now anyone want to tell me why Thunderbird will not let me paste in >>> stuff except as a quote? That started a few upgrades back. Whatever >>> happened to software that worked the way you expected it to? Don't >>> remind me, it never existed and probably never well. >>> >>> -graywolf >>> >>> >>> David Mann wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I would definitely advise against saving a jpg from a Pro Photo file >>>> without converting to sRGB first. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
