[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I could live with a larger body. Thing is, part of the attraction of the 645n is its small size. Give it interchangeable backs and its just like any other 645. Plus, you can still preload inserts for quick film changes, you just can't change mid-roll without wasting the rest of the roll. If you're in that situation where you want to go from film to film quickly, why not shoot 120 instead of 220? Then you're only shooting 15 shots per roll.
Oh, and the inserts are less than a third the price of a back for a 'blad, despite the similar body prices. That should be taken into account, too. I think that supersizing the 645n to accomodate interchangeable backs would be like supersizing the MZ-3 to get a faster drive speed out of it. -Aaron who still marvels at how much smaller his Pentax 67 is than any interchangeable back 6x7 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
