I doubt it. Images made with a compacter is probably not very reproducible....
Kenneth Waller wrote: >> But it makes sense that they don't want to show what competitors >> lenses are capable of. >> > > That can be taken several ways. > > Does Canon or Nikon publish shots taken with compactors gear? > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Declined... > > > >> One difficulty in submitting is that both camera and lens must be >> Pentax. That lets out many of my photographs from being submitted. >> But it makes sense that they don't want to show what competitors >> lenses are capable of. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> Sunday, March 4, 2007, 12:04:02 PM, you wrote: >> >> PS> I have no declines, some on hold, a few in collection and a handful in >> PS> gallery. >> PS> On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> >> >>>> I have no declines, but a bunch on hold. I figured they must have >>>> gone to sleep or something. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> Sunday, March 4, 2007, 9:54:30 AM, you wrote: >>>> >>>> DB> Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery >>>> and >>>> DB> had declined. >>>> >>>> DB> I'll start: >>>> >>>> DB> http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm >>>> >>>> >>>> DB> Doug Brewer >>>> DB> http://www.drivingtheflies.com >>>> > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
