>
> From:
> Cotty
> On 4/3/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>   
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This is interesting, and somewhat related to the stuff below:
>> >http://www.epuk.org/News/472/npower-injunction-on-epuk-member
>> >
>> >I happen to know the photographer concerned - he lives in your neck of
>> >the woods, Cotty, and we have a number of mutual friends. As well as
>> >the environmental photography mentioned in the article, he spent time
>> >in Rwanda and (I think) Macedonia. He has also worked for aid agencies
>> >in Ethiopia, which is where my connection with him comes from.
>> >Definitely one of the good guys.
>> >
>> >http://www.arbib.org/
>>     
>
> I haven't met Adrian, although as a news organisation we have been
> covering the Radley lakes story over the years. I've been up there
> several times to film. The injunction applies to the media as well, and
> the boss sent an email around noting that. Worryingly, the injunction
> actually stipulates that one cannot photograph/film as opposed to
> actually publish the results.
>
> This stems from animal rights activists photographing individuals on
> building sites in Oxford where the animal research lab is being built.
> Activists subsequently targeted individuals and criminal activity took
> place. This is the establishment's pre-emptive strike at the activists.
> I strongly disagree with the principle, as it limits a free media. If
> there are activists out there photographing people with the intention of
> identifying them with the intent to commit a crime, then fine - round
> them all up and arrest on charges of obstruction - which is what happens
> anyways, it's all a cat and mouse game they play. Or target known
> individuals with injunctions - as happens already (and frequently) but a
> blanket ban? That's censorship and disgraceful.
>
> Guess what the result is? We've stopped covering the story.
And y'all don't have a 1st Amendment to fall back on either.

Not that the current government in the US appears too concerned about 
the 1st Amendment rights of anyone who disagrees with them.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to