I thought you meant the 18-200. Seems a bit excessive for a walk about lens. And a bit limiting unless you plan to take photos from blocks away.
Ryan Lee wrote: > The link on that page is javascript, but here's the content link: > http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/200_500_28.htm > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:16 PM > Subject: OT: Sigma 200-500 2.8 EX DG > > > >> http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/index.htm >> >> Hey how's this for a walkabout lens? >> >> Cheers, >> Ryan >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
