Thanks Dave. And thanks for your PS advice. It was a tough one. A half stop of minus exposure comp would have helped here, but of course I didn't have time to fool with things. It was either shoot or miss it. But I think that "bad light" is sometimes a good thing. Paul On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
> That's much better. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 3/11/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've done a third rendering. I went back to the RAW and was able to >> recover more highlight detail. I then applied the shadow/highlight >> tool >> and worked on the curves a bit. I gave it just a touch of highlight >> burn as well, but not enough to cause that weird tonality that I >> achieved in my first rendering:-). I'm deleting the earlier file, >> because I have a magazine editor looking at the "It Happened on >> Woodward" gallery tomorrow. Thanks for all the feedback. Here's the >> final: >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5704742 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
