I have been thinking about that. I tightened to the point where I was able to pan without using much force. It could be interesting to retry with the head untightened.
Tim Typo Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Waller Sent: 12. mars 2007 20:05 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Testing: SR and gimbal mount I suspect there may be some difference on the effects of SR depending on whether the camera or lens is suspended in the gimbal head. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Testing: SR and gimbal mount Tim Øsleby wrote: > I will do a follow up, and test at less critical speeds. I feel pretty > confident that SR does not have any effect using critical shutter speeds, > but it might have negative effect using other speeds. > > I'll probably report back on this later. Hey, Tim, as a comparison, I'll run through some tests with the in-lens IS on my new Canon 500/4 and the Wimberley sidekick (poor man's gimbal). All my nature-shooting Canon friends leave IS on all the time. I never did side-by-side with the 300/4 IS (old first generation IS) and a regular ball head. I'll let you know what I see and post the shots of IS on a and off. What Gimbal head do you have? -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
