Peter, I prefer the original. The new shot contains too many elements (like the shed) that distract from the, ummm, characterful building.
Rick --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure it was worth revisiting but I decided to > have another go at > this image. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_shadshackrevisited.html > > Equipment: > Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax 17mm fisheye f4.0 > Defished using PT Tools, converted to B&W using > fotomatic B&W plus > Yellow filter applied > > In case anyone cares here's the previous version. > > http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_shadshack.html > > -- > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee > ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl > fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
