That looks interesting - thanks for the link. -- Bob
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott Loveless > Sent: 23 March 2007 17:12 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: One that got accepted > > You might consider some other ideas. Vandyke looks > particularly attractive to me. It's not very expensive, > especially compared to using copper plates, and does not > require a darkroom. My largest camera is a 4x5, which I > don't think is quite large enough for contact printing, but > if I ever get an 8x10...... > > http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Vandyke/vandyke.html > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com/ > Shoot more film! > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >It would be better if used a Wisner. > > > > > > Just the other day, out of the blue, my S.O. asked me, > "Do you have > > a > > > large format camera?" > > > > > > "No" > > > > > > "Do you want one?" > > > > > > That got me thinking, hmmmm..... > > > > > > > my thoughts have been running along similar lines recently, since I > > started looking more at Victorian photographs. I would like to make > > some photogravures from 10x8 negatives, but it looks spectacularly > > expensive. > > > > On the other hand, the Gandolfi workshop is not far from here, so > > maybe I could hire one. And there must be somewhere in London that > > teaches photogravure... > > > > Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
