On pics with a lot of detail, RPM makes a difference, particularly in large sizes. but only on glossy or luster papers. I print a lot of 11 x17 on Premium Luster paper. You can see the difference there. On matte papers, there is no noticeable difference. (I don't even think they have an RPM profile for Velvet Fine Art, although you can choose it in the Print dialog box.) I've found that the specific ICC profiles make a bit of difference in rendering, particularly with Velvet Fine Art, where I use the VFA "Best Photo" ICC profile rather than the drive installed profile. On Mar 31, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Ah, yes. I have them, just haven't bothered to install them. I always > use "Best Photo" quality and these profiles work fine. > > I see little point to using other than best photo quality. Why would > you? > > G > > On Mar 31, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> However, if you've installed all the ICC profiles, you'll have >> individual choices for photo quality, best photo quality and RPM >> quality. Check the Epson website. >> Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
