One other thing need mentioning.  I have been
to many car events in my life but hadnt been
to one in about 5 or 6 years. What has changed,
is that about 2/3 or more of the cars now are
restored to BETTER THAN NEW condition. Its
unbelievable what they are doing now with 
the body work and paint. The bodies look
like glass they are so smooth. What was excellent 10 yrs ago
is now garbage compared to today's top level
body work...
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Web
Gallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...


Thanks. Much appreciated.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 9:44 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:

> if you are interested in the prices of '55's,
> search the www.barrett-jackson.com website
> as it lists the final prices of all cars
> sold this year. the values of the cars are
> highly dependent on the level of restoration,
> whether they are numbers matching, and
> of course, the drive train it has.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:05 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Web Gallery
> :Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
>
>
> Thanks, good news. I may have to sell my '55 if I don't land a job  
> soon.
> Paul On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:06 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>> I think the one you are talking about went for $73K
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Paul Stenquist
>> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:30 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Web Gallery :
>> Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
>>
>>
>> John,
>> Do you know what the selling price was for the 56 Chevy BelAir
>> Convertible?
>> Paul
>> On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:24 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>
>>> I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont
>>> do "lowest common denominator" web photos, if your
>>> screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen,
>>> then you simply dont GET to see them. Even reducing
>>> them to 800 pixels wide "ruins" them IHMO.
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>> John Celio
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:04 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: Web Gallery : Barrett-Jackson
>>> CollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
>>>
>>>
>>> JCO, you may have a large screen or eyes that can handle super-high
>>> resolution, but not everyone is so blessed.  I, for instance, use my
>>> laptop
>>> for everything, and it has a 15.4" screen.  I don't like having it
>>> set
>>> to a
>>> super-high resolution because that makes text too small to read
>>> comfortably.
>>>
>>> Also, one of the first things I learned regarding webdesign is to
>>> set up
>>>
>>> your site so that the greatest number of people will be able to
>>> view it
>>> comfortably.  Since my website's stats show 1024x768 being the
>>> most-often
>>> used resolution by my visitors, I design for that resolution.  If  
>>> you
>>> really
>>> must have larger photos, just spend the time to make smaller  
>>> versions
>>> too.
>>> You may consider it a waste of time, but you'll keep a lot more of
>>> your
>>> visitors if you don't force them to have to scroll around every time
>>> they
>>> want to look at one of your photos.  I only looked at a few of your
>>> photos
>>> (which were really nice, by the way.  I love many of those cars)
>>> before
>>> I
>>> got tired of having to scroll every time and went on to something
>>> else.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.neovenator.com http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to