<SIGH> This was supposed to be about your bird pic, not the field pic, which I've net yet looked at. I think the posting error is all Marnie's fault. Bad Girl! Marnie <LOL>
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Bruce, > > I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from > the more typical bird closeup - putting the little winged creature into a > larger context than just a closeup on a branch seems to get me more > "involved" with the scene, somewhat akin to having been there as opposed to > just looking at a pic that should be in a book about bird identification. > The second (tighter cropped) version works best for me. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. > > This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's > > suggestion and tried a crop: > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm > > > > Original: > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
