NOPE, Your argument is futile because the PC display is JUST a cheap accessory to go with digital/DSLR photography and its WAY WAY less costly than the DSLR and good lenses so what I am arguing is that it's SENSELESS to be into DSLR photography AND not upgrade to current BUT INEXPENSIVE display resolutions to edit and enjoy those high res. DSLR images more easily or with higher quality reproduction.... The affordability factor is a NON issue because if you can afford the cameras and lenses, you can easily afford a good display monitor setup. I am not saying anyone can afford a good monitor setup, I am saying anymore DSLR system owners can. This is not HDTV, this is digital photography discussion which is far more relavant to the list... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:52 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... And as such, encompasses a wide range of people with different needs, budgets, values, experience, and interests. This is starting to remind me of the HDTV thread a while back. Can't you get it through your thick skull that not everyone can afford or even want the best. And what hubris you have telling me what I can afford and can't afford. Were you to know my situation you'd take up a collection for me. Further, I have a recent machine and a monitor capable of generating the higher resolution, but I like the resolution at which I work. It's comfortable for my eyes and style, and I've no need/desire to use a higher resolution right now. Web images are a secondary concern for me. I'm more concerned with prints, which I view in real life. May I quote you? " Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > SCREW YOU, WHEN YOU FINALLY UPGRADE SOME > DAY ( WHY ARE YOU WAITING? CANT AFFORD > IT? I DONT BELIEVE THAT ). > YOU WILL ONLY T H E N UNDERSTAND THAT IT MAKES/MADE NO > SENSE TO BE USING THOSE OLD RESOLUTIONS > WHEN YOU CAN/COULD HAVE UPGRADED SO INEXPENSIVELY > TODAY 4/3/07 ! THIS IS A PHOTO GROUP, DUH! > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Shel Belinkoff > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:43 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: > WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > You don't know what you're talking about, or what the "demographic" of > this list is. There are people here who can just barely afford one > camera and a basic lens or two; there are people with various vision > problems; there are people who have more important things to spend > their money on than high-tech gear, such as making house payments, > sending kids through college, caring for ill or infirm family members; > students and those working their way through school or just starting > out in life. I cannot believe that you are so pig-headed as to dis > count these people. > > Photo enthusiast encompass a wide range of people ... y'know, I have > a friend in Peru, I'm her daughter's godfather, and the only computer > her daughter has to use is a very low-spec unit at her school. Should > I discount sender her pics because she doesn't measure up to some > arbitrary elitist standard. I said it before and I'll say it again: > You're a schmuck. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: J. C. O'Connell > > > P.S. I am not having any problems to solve, > > only the people who want me to "dumb way down" > > my posted photos for them are... I suggest > > those still using really old low spec displays find some resizing > > software or something to make them more usable, if they cant be > > bothered to upgrade their "photographically challenged" hardware.... > > As I stated, the hardware needed to see these > > photos in their entirety is NOT even remotely expensive > > today, so it doesnt make sense to continue > > using those older lower resolution display setups, > > ESCPECIALLY if you are in the demographic of > > a photo enthusiast, and anyone reading this forum IS. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
