On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:28, David J Brooks wrote: > I think they turned out fine. SA bit of motion blur helps add to the > "being there" effect. > > I have a similar one in May. Now i have the K10D, i think i'll do some > in available light and fast primes with SR. >
I found myself wondering if the K10D with its SR would have helped in this situation... and then I worried about that somewhat-stripey noise I've seen in some low-light, poorly-exposed examples. And I thought to myself: "What am I doing here, if not shooting totally underexposed frames at high ISO? Would the K10D just make these unusable or are those "flawed samples"??" Anyone with the K10D care to comment on the forgiveness of this camera in less-than-optimal low-light situations? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org I am riding in the MS-TRAM this summer. Please consider sponsoring me! http://charles.robinsontwins.org/mstram.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
