Right, it's just his "analysis" ,full of biased opinion, not factual or truthful however,,,Remember, he's the one who claimed I "buggered up" the web gallery by NOT degrading the photos enough for his limited display when in fact its his limited display that is doing the "buggering up" of that gallery. He can't blame the higher quality recording because of a poor, older, incompatible, incapable of displaying high resolution without scrolling, image playback system... That's exactly what he did in this case... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of keith_w Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:42 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: POLL - Computer Screen Size & Resolution William Robb wrote: >> Sure. But constructive advice is not what happened. He showed the >> pictures in all good faith, and people started having a go at him. >> It's just bullying, and he has a right to defend himself. > Not quite. > I went back and read the thread in the archives. > Constructive advice was exactly how this started, and it would have > stopped in it's tracks if joc had used common manners and good grace > rather than his typical approach whenever someone suggests something > to him that he decides to be disagreeable about (which, as you know, > is pretty much everything). If you check the archives, you will find > joc made the first insulting/derogatory comment, and it escalated from > there. It's just another case of joc playing the petty tyrant, and > then feigning innocence when he is called out on it. > > William Robb I think that's a good analysis, William! Keith ~ from the other CA. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
