Well said and obviously true. Paul On Apr 6, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Bob W wrote:
> I really think you should go back to the beginning of the thread about > resolution, and read it again. What you will see is John reacting > perfectly reasonably to a few initially friendly comments about the > size of the photos he posted. He explained that it was a quick & dirty > gallery, and explained why he didn't want to make the pictures > smaller. Later he also explained that if he was putting up a more > professional gallery he would include smaller overview-type pictures > linking to the larger ones. > > What you will also see is that people started to include increasingly > sarcastic unprovoked and snippy personal comments and nasty little > insults intended to goad him. When that was successful people > immediately launched into full scale bullying and criticism of him. > > If people hadn't started to snipe at him the thread would have petered > out like any other. But this list has developed a nasty little habit > of picking on John at every little opportunity. It's ugly and it's > time it stopped. > > -- > Bob > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby >> Sent: 06 April 2007 01:43 >> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >> Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO >> >> John. I have a question: Does this tactic work? >> >> I think the number of posts in the resolution threads >> suggests otherwise. >> The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant situation > also >> suggests otherwise IMO. >> >> I honestly think it is time to reconsider this tactic. >> >> And John :-) >> This is not an attack. It is mainly an observation from the > sideline. >> >> >> Tim Typo >> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
