Man that is a heavy stark result. If that's the way you like it, then it's right.
Jack --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my > "proofs" > and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones > suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and > > the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up > in > the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high > saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html > > Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. > smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 > > Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored > > -- > > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw > uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
