It's meant to look like rock, but they built it from inexpensive concrete. ann sanfedele wrote: > Isn't it the kind of rock? > looks like grano-diorite to me > > ann > > > Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote: > > >> As per Rob Studdert's comment, the surface texture - I see distinct black >> spots, rather than the customary grainy rough-concrete surfact texture. But >> then it could be just because of the reduced image size. >> >> Maris >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> >> >>> Interesting comment, Maris. On what basis? I see no halo effect, no >>> afterglow, no crispiness. Where do you see evidence of >>> oversharpening. Not trying to be argumentative, just curious. >>> Paul >>> On Apr 17, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Composition and B&W conversion look very good. For me, it appears >>>> oversharpened. >>>> >>>> Maris >>>> >>>> P. J. Alling wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/pirellibuildingdetail.html >>>>> >>>>> Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited >>>>> >>>>> Notes: B&W conversion in using B&W plus yellow filter applied. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
