Yes. I was just jerking your chain for the fun of it. It was expecially humorous because you dislike video and audio distortion so much, yet we all tolerate distortion in the form of misspellings, left out words, and improper grammar, when it comes to the written word, hence my jest.
Tom C. >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can playPAL >Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:05:49 -0400 > >look if you cant even accept a simple typo >I suggest you are just looking for argument >to argue.. Whats next? You are going >to state I dont definately dont know how to spell "reader" >and use this post as your ever so desired "proof". >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Tom C >Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1:27 PM >To: pdml@pdml.net >Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can playPAL > > >My mistake. That was 'roofread'. > > >Tom C. > > > > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >To: pdml@pdml.net > >Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can playPAL > >Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:22:17 -0600 > > > >You're not much of a 'riter' either. You might want 'rooread' what you > >'rite' though. > > > >Otherwise when it enters the eyes of the 'eader' it's 'so distorted to > >the point all the life has been choked out of it'. > > > > > >Tom C. > > > > > > >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> > > >Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can > > >playPAL > > >Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:15:55 -0400 > > > > > >Sarcasm is not always noted.... > > >Reading is reading and listing to music > > >is listening to music, and watching films > > >is watching films. These are different > > >media but NONE of them are "better" > > >than the other which is often what many > > >so called "readers" try to imply. > > >Reading is not somehow better than watching > > >a film or listening to music and vice > > >versa. I never said I am not a "eader" > > >BTW which many are assuming I am not > > >just because I enjoy HD home theater so much.... > > >jco > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > >Of Shel Belinkoff > > >Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:15 PM > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can > > >playPAL > > > > > > > > >I can't believe JCO actually posted that! My Gawd! I'll have to > > >read the full content of THAT message in the archives. > > > > > >Hey, JCO, get yourself some crayons and your books can have pretty > > >pictures as well. > > > > > >Shel > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > > > > > >No, you have full right to stare at a blank wall > > > > >every eveinng if you choose or if you prefer, > > > > >to read books all the time. But then again, books dont have the > > > > >pretty pictures HD home theaters provide do they? jco > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > They say the eyes are the windows to one's soul. > > > > > > > > GIGO. > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >PDML@pdml.net > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > >-- > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >PDML@pdml.net > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >PDML@pdml.net > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net