I wasn't baiting. I frankly couldn't care less how/if he responds.
Tom C. >From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh >Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:15:38 -0400 > >So what is the word for compulsive baiting ? > >Kenneth Waller > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > > > > egomania irrational self-centered attitude or self-worship > > > > enissomania inability to prevent onself from attacking or > > critcizing > > > > rhinotillexomania compulsive nose picking > > > > Tom C. > > > >>From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> > >>Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > >>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:25 -0400 > >> > >>Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show > >>he is completely clueless. His deductions make > >>no sense because he either doesnt understand > >>or never noticed how unsharp mask works > >>or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly > >>stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible > >>in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain > >>bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that > >>based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it. > >> > >>jco > >>----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>William Robb > >>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:20 PM > >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > >> > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Thibouille" > >>Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > >> > >> > >> > Mmm I find the bokeh to be quite OK: not bad but not good either. But > >> > this lens seems very sharp otherwise. > >> > > >> > Mmm I wonder if digital vs film has a big influence over bokeh. I'd > >> > like to see a comparison like this. > >> > >>Something I discovered very early on, thanks to Valentin, was that the > >>surest way to screw up bokeh is to apply sharpening to the image. The > >>M85 > >>has just about the smoothest bokeh of any lens I have seen: > >>http://plg.komkon.org/m85_2/bo1.html. > >>But, like anything else, heavy handed treatment can bugger things up. > >> > >>William Robb > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net