Simplicity of design should make no real difference in Bokah. Minelli Flavio wrote: > I'm jumping in without knowledge of preceeding messages on this thread > so forgive me if I'm repeating somone else's words. > > I have this lens, even if I didn't use it (as the rest of my photo gear) > for a long time. My guess is that the simplicity of the lens design, > including only 5 optical elements vs. 7 or 8 in other 85 mm (non soft) > Pentax lenses and a low number of diaphragm blades, could have an effect > on the bokeh. > > Ciao, Flavio > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > J. C. O'Connell > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:50 AM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh - the photo > > Ok, but I think the quality or > lack thereof is independent > of performance optimization > at any paricular focussing distance, > and since this is a "portrait" > type lens, it probably is focus > optimized at a closer distance > than inifinity. My hunch is they > sacrificed the bokeh quality to make it physically > a VERY small optical/mechanical design. > jco > > ... > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above > and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in > error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please > return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have > any questions, please contact us by replying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank you > > www.telecomitalia.it > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
