Glad to be of help. From that description, it seems like exporting your finished work to a 'completed' directory tree as I do and then letting ExpressDigital Darkroom do its thing with that could work well, complementing the original exposure import and editing workflow.
I find it important to separate my finished work from "work in progress" this way. I always want to be able to return to the exact file that made a print when I fulfill a subsequent print order and not risk having modified it further inadvertently. Sometimes being a photographer makes photography so much more business management than it is making photographs... ! Godfrey On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Hello Godfrey, > > Good information. Yes, much of my organizational comments were based > on beta. I have run the release version but not much compared to the > beta. A big area for me is that the ExpressDigital Darkroom product > does much the same kind of thing as Lightroom - and Darkroom handles > all of my online ordering system along with direct connection to the > lab, etc. A much more needed tool for me than the raw converter. So > I end up with two systems - one at each end of the workflow, wanting > to manage the data. To date, I have used lighter weight tools on the > front end (pre-finished files) and let Darkroom do it's organization. > > Based on what you have described, I may give Lightroom another go, as > the raw and editing tools I found to be very nice, indeed. > > Thanks for your comments. > > -- > Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
