I was not slanting anything as you falsely allude to. The whole news will break and everyone can read it for themseleves.
It's not good practice to quote an entire article. Tom C. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: pdml@pdml.net >Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D >Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:00:36 EDT > > >Thursday, May 10, 2007 4:55 a.m. (JST) > >Pentax To Sell Tokyo HQ, Quit Low-Profit Ops To Lift Corp Value > >TOKYO (Nikkei)--Pentax Corp. plans to sell its Tokyo headquarters and >withdraw from less profitable businesses under strategies the camera maker >has >crafted to block a takeover bid by optical glass manufacturer Hoya Corp. , >The >Nikkei learned Wednesday. >=========== > >I think that gives the news a slightly different slant. > >Marnie aka Doe > >--------------------------------------------- >Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > >************************************** See what's free at >http://www.aol.com. > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
