I think it is how you stated it - you have clarified it much better here. I understood you to say that DPReview is less biased than PDML - which is plainly obvious - as it should be. It didn't read like you were complaining about the misinformation remark.
I think the misinformation on DPReview stems from the forum participants, rather than the site administrators - really much more like a PDML, if you well - just a bunch of different ones. So you can get any type of misinformation that you want. The reviews and news are much less biased. -- Bruce Monday, May 14, 2007, 4:36:43 PM, you wrote: TC> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out there for TC> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree with the TC> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, quality of TC> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own cameras. TC> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. TC> Tom C. >>From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com >>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:30:54 -0700 >> >>hmmm....a site that caters to all different makes of cameras is less >>biased than a list that caters to a specific single brand...amazing! >> >>-- >>Bruce >> >> >>Monday, May 14, 2007, 4:13:28 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> >> >>Now where will we go for our misinformation? >> >> >> >>Bob >> >> >> >>TC> I find dpreview less biased than this mailing list. >> >>TC> Tom C. >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
