I said for resolution comparison tests. They could, in fact should, still test the camera with whatever kit lens came with the camera, for handling etc.
Dario Bonazza wrote: > P. J. Alling wrote: > > >> It wouldn't be all that expensive. How many lens mounts are there in >> Digital currently? >> >> Pentax, Canon, Minolta, Nikon, 4/3, and now Leica. >> >> They could probably dispense with Leica. >> >> In fact get an Adaptal II Macro, (focal length is even relatively >> unimportant), for the sensor resolution tests. Every thing else could >> be tested with the lens that came with the test camera, but the sensor >> resolution test would be much more honest using the same lens for each >> test, removing a major variation. >> > > OK, that looks like a good method for removing variations. > Unfortunately, it will also be completely useless for customers, as none of > them will ever use that camera that way. > > Dario > > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
