tom wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > PM, Ryan Charron wrote: > > > > > > > > > It just does, that's all there is to it! > > > > > > > > > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close. > > > > > > > > While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every device made by > > > > Canon and Nikon, I must respectfully voice the opinion that THE PENTAX > > > > 67 KICKS ITS ASS. > > > > > > The 67 is too fat and slow to catch a 645n in order to kick it's ass... > > > > > > tv > > > > > > > ...more like rec.photo.35mm every day... > > Shut up! > > BTW, what's the best film for taking pictures of various things?
Yeah, and what's the best lens to use, Canon or Nikon? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
