In a message dated 5/17/2007 9:11:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If so... Do you find the K100D AF to be much better (quicker, specially in low light)? Does the SR really work for you? (I mean, it let you take pictures that were impossible to do with the DS?) Do you find that the K100D jpgs are much better than the DS ones? Do you miss the DS bigger viewfinder? Do you miss the DS bigger buffer?
Thanks, Jaume (with yet another 'enablement attack') ========== Haven't done it yet, but been thinking about it for about a month or two. I was planning to do it, now I am not sure. I have the DS currently for sale on ebay. For me, the reason would be AS (anti-shake), which is a good enough reason. I am not that steady. Always amuses me how others turn their noses up at that reason. They must be very steady. K10D has been and remains beyond my price range, K100D looks worth it. But now I am waiting to see what happens with Pentax. Sounds like they may stay in business for a while, but I need to wait a bit and see. Good luck. Marnie aka Doe :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
