On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:07:35 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 5/25/2007 7:04:02 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > This release has a bit more positive tone than some. Hope it's > warranted. > > Jack > > ========= > Actually, about 1/2 of them have been positive in tone. I think > Pentaxians > tend to jump to negative conclusions a bit more than they should.
One or two Pentaxians, whose sheer volume of posts tends to suggest that they are more numerous than they actually are. John Why > shouldn't a bigger company want to jump in on Pentax's DSLRs which have > AS and have > been selling well? See if they can run with it and do even better? But > maybe > that's just me, looking for silver linings. > > So, yeah, let's hope it's warranted. > > Marnie aka Doe ;-) > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > ************************************** See what's free at > http://www.aol.com. > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
