Alex, You need to apologize. Such rude and boorish behavior has no place on our list. I reluctantly suggest that the first words which come to mind are Grow-Up. Regards, Bob S.
On 5/29/07, AlexG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You accuse me of being a racist, wife beating rapist. Then you argue > for the intellectual value of the feminist movement and the virtue of > an open mind. You then decide to follow up with an assumption of me of > having a "tiny winy" hog and difficulty getting it into the game, and, > and make this a root cause of some fear of women. > > It pleases me to see that, upon having nothing to say (see previous > post) you fell back on raw, unfiltered emotion, allowed it to feed > upon itself, and released a volley of nonsensical, groundless > accusations, which, with slight differences in subject matter remind > one of schoolyard name calling. I never posted anything remotely > inappropriate. A couple of joking comments were enough to expose your > significant insecurities & trust issues. You identified with the > subservient role that was implied and, hating yourself for it > attempted to gain the moral high ground, using, in order, the race, > faith, nationality, and sexual orientation cards. These are parallels > used by weak minds because of the nearly universal sympathy they > garner. In so doing YOU are the racist, nazi homophobe. By using them > for your own purposes, you legitimize the hatred of each group, and > you condone the SEGREGATION of each into a distinct group in the first > place, as opposed to just other human beings. > > Allow me to expound upon the true nature of gender relations. Consider > yourself lucky because this is akin to Cliffnotes that never made it > to print. > > Feminists are feminists because they loathe the subservient role they > are expected to play in society. A fact they are aware of but > consciously ignore is that in the end, might wins out over ideals. > > -The average man can *destroy* the average woman with relatively > little effort because of physiological differences (musculature + bone > density). > -The average man has thought processes that tend to logic/reason vs emotion. > -Biologically, the man must WANT to mate. The woman can be forced to mate. > > Or, to bring it down to your level of understanding, man is the > f*ckER. Woman is the f*ckEE > > ********I mention these points because you yourself alluded to them.******* > > A woman knows these facts on a subconscious (and occasionally > conscious level) and can counteract them with one tool: emotion. > Emotion is a state of mind every human experiences but which males > suppress or ignore. It makes us uncomfortable because it is at odds > with our logical thoughts. (example, wanting a Limited lens when you > intellectually know the differences in image quality will be minor at > best) > > Women have used their emotional acuity to manipulate men since time > immemorial. This is not always done consciously or maliciously, but it > can take these forms. It is how women make a place for themselves in > the world. Playing on insecurities, manipulating attraction, > encouraging dissent, etc. > > This is not to say that there are no women who can stand on physical > merits or mental prowess, and this is not to imply that emotionalism > constitutes arrested mental development. However, I have met many > brilliant women who have experienced abusive relationships simply > because they are conscious of the above facts and are susceptible to > manipulation because of them. I have also met women who are incapable > of making the simplest logical decisions but can spot every last > nuance in a social setting. > > Militant feminists demand that both men and women be given the same > social rights. This is hypocrisy at its most odious because the same > social right would mean it's OK to hit women. It would mean that it's > OK to deny women maternity leave. Feminists believe in equal rights, > whenever it's convenient. > > On the subject of wife beating, any man secure in his sense of self > wants to be the dominant player in the relationship. The intelligent > man will be able to outmaneuver the woman and get her in a mental > state in which she couldn't IMAGINE going against his will, would do > anything for her man (hence, dominance) despite the man being an > emotional neophyte in comparison. The unintelligent man will dominate > in any possible way, and this is usually violence. > > As an aside, I would like to state that I would never hit a woman, > even one as heinous or as oblivious to common decency as you. > > Since you have brought us into the business of judging others with no > real basis, I will partake. You have been ravaged by stupidity and > years of superficial, meaningless thought. I can only hope you never > succeeded in tricking a man into impregnating you, for the damage to > his bloodline would be catastrophic. You offer precisely nothing, and > it disgusts me that I've taken the time to respond to you. > > Which leads me to my next point. > > To the Gents on this list: > > I take it that the complete non-reaction to Eactivist's post means either > a) This is normal behavior for her, and is to be ignored > b) You agree with her accusations of my being an utter scumbag > c) You've seen enough drama and bullshit, often involving Aperture > Simulators to not care enough to respond. > > Which is it? If I have acted inappropriately, or inappropriately > enough to warrant such a psychotic response, please tell me so. I > haven't been on this list long but I respect your opinions. > > As for why I took offense, I fail to see how believing in the 1950s > nuclear family unit makes me a barbaric, cross-burning, neo-nazi, > country-invading sexual deviant. > > > > On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a message dated 5/29/2007 6:54:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I see no reason to respond to ignorant prejudice. > > > > If you substituted Black, Jew, Pole, Gay or any other designation for women > > in your sentences it would be very clear to everyone how extremely > > prejudiced > > you are. Should I respond that you probably beat women in real life? Maybe > > rape them? That much misogynism in a man is always suspect. > > > > Feminists only argue about sexism with men when they think minds can be > > changed. With normal men who they are trying to get to see another, wider > > viewpoint. That has worked over the years because most men, when they act > > sexist and > > say sexist tings, are basically being sexist unconsciously without thinking > > things through. Because most men basically like women and when it is > > pointed > > out they are making assumptions that hurt women, they change or will try to > > change. > > > > You, sir, are way, way, way beyond that. Maybe I should say a man so > > threatened by women must have a tiny winy dick? Or can't get it up? I > > could say lots > > of nasty things in response, but why bother? Your head is obviously up your > > ass and anyone reading your comments about women can tell that. > > > > I won't respond anymore. You are killfiled. Right now I am only reading > > quotes. I won't respond to quotes in the future either. I am just making my > > stance extremely clear to others on this list who may read your shit. > > > > Prejudice this strong should have consequences, but also pointed out for > > what it is. Ignorant and blind and hurtful. > > > > Marnie aka Doe > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > > > > > > ************************************** See what's free at > > http://www.aol.com. > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Wanna get in shape? > Set a goal, snap a pic of youself, and join the PDML Traineo group! > > http://pdml.groups.traineo.com/ > > "Because only Nikonians should be fatsos!" > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
