...and I think sample variation may well cover any slight MTF differences. BTW, I included the Tamron $1100 price as a negative. :-)
Jack --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. But 40% more on price, 50% more on weight, larger too. AND I > could not find a single person (at the time I was looking for one in > > 2004) who had any experience at all with the Tamron nor any examples > > of its rendering qualities. Still haven't seen more than two or three > > photos taken with it. > > I couldn't find any examples of the DA14 rendering either, but the > DA14 plus the *ist DS body cost me only $200 more than the Tamron > would have, and about half what the Canon EF14/2.8L would have ... > and my testing with that one had been very disappointing. > > I've since made more than 1800 photos with the DA14 and feel very > good about it. ;-) > > Godfrey > > On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Compared Photozone MTF tests results on the DA 14 and the Tamron > 14. > > Tamron superior f/2.8 through f/5.6, but DA slightly superior at > f/8 > > and 11. > > (Have seen the Tamron priced at 'prox $1100). > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
