That's actually what I meant. Certainly, use the haze to make your point. I gather you also feel as I do that even if you wanted to, the haze may be difficult to overcome and in addition, I see no reason for you to fight it.
Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 6/7/2007 12:07:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Ugly buildings and sun angle haze (suggesting air pollution) may fit > well in your project. > I do think that you may not be able to completely overcome the time > of > day haze and its detail cloaking effect. > > Jack > > =========== > Okay, thanks, Jack. I keep wondering if it's really necessary. Why > not flat, > why not haze? I mean, well, if not pretty why not not pretty, why > not close > to how it looked? But maybe that is just me. I think it needs more > contrast, > somehow, though. > > Thanks for looking, Marnie aka Doe > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > ************************************** See what's free at > http://www.aol.com. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
