2007/6/8, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Some people want things pixel-perfect: A level of accuracy that's > beyond what's visible in any realistic conditions. But if you judged > where to position the ND Grad visually - you can judge where to put the > Photoshop filtering just as easily.
Of course. And then we're back to whether one wish to perform this in the field or in front of the 'puter. The only argument pro computer, as far as I can see, is that you can shape your gradients to the contours of the horizon. Marnies recent "advancing wave" was an excellent example, btw. But you missed my point, which was that if you _have_ applied a NDgrad in field that comes with a colour tint, it will be a pain to compensate for it afterwards in photoshop. Depending on your pain threshold, I suppose, but recommended against Cokin NDgrads for the colour tint reason. A good, neutral NDgrad can do a good job in the field. A poor, tinted NDgrad just gives you _extra_ work in PS. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
